The Moon is a “Noah’s Ark” from space and someone abandoned it a long time ago

The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) categorically rejects suggestions that our Moon is not solid, but initiatives funded by the space agency indicate continued interest in the composition of its interior.

The routine discovery of hundreds of lunar surface skylights (holes in the Moon through which the cavernous tunnels beneath it can be seen) recently led NASA to sponsor the development of robotic mini-rovers designed to take images and study alien cracks.

The authors of a study published in the October 2020 issue of Earth-Science Reviews calculated the size of these huge lunar cavities. The results showed that many of these underground cavities are hundreds of times larger than anything that can be seen on Earth. According to the person in charge of the study, one of the great lunar tunnels “could easily house a small city within its walls.”

Together, these events have revived speculation about the Moon’s true composition and internal structure.

The idea that Earth’s closest neighbor in space might be empty has had its fair share of adherents over the years.

The modern “hollow moon theory” can be traced back in part to a book published in 1966 by the eminent astronomer Carl Sagan and the Russian astrophysicist IS Shklovsky. His work ”  Intelligent Life in the Universe  ” contained a chapter on the curious nature of the moons that revolve around Mars: Phobos and Deimos.

According to their calculations, these objects had an abnormally low density, which led them to wonder: Are they “hard on the outside but hollow on the inside”?

The authors wondered if an advanced Martian civilization might have created artificial satellites to function as low-gravity platforms. This orbital arrangement would allow them to launch missions into deep space more easily, an advantage that Earth’s moon also offers.

The mysterious monolith of Phobos (Credit: Mars Global Surveyor/NASA)

The grandfather of NASA’s rocket program, Dr. Wernher von Braun, inadvertently fueled the Hollow Moon legend by writing for Popular Mechanics an article about the Apollo 13 mission plan to crash the 15-ton portion of a rocket Saturn V against the lunar surface.

This experiment was a follow-up to the deliberate crash of the Apollo 12 lunar module, which resulted in the moon “ringing like a bell for nearly an hour, indicating a strange and otherworldly subterranean structure.”

Even though Apollo 13 failed to land on the moon, they were able to deliver a payload for the experiment, with results similar to the lunar shake from the previous impact.

Mission Control briefed the Apollo 13 crew on their success: “It looks like your booster just hit the moon and that’s shaking it up a bit.” This suggestive phrase has served as fodder for theorists who argue that the Moon may be mostly hollow.

Building on Sagan’s earlier musings on the nature of the Martian moons, two Russian scientists, Vasin and Shcherbakov, suggested that the Moon’s features could be resolved with a logical explanation: the Moon is an artificial hollow object, a satellite that was placed especially close to our planet highly developed extraterrestrial civilization.

The Soviet duo published their thoughts on the matter in a 1970 article titled “Is the Moon a Creation of Extraterrestrial Intelligence?” His circumstantial assumptions about an alien-created satellite paved the way for what became known as the “lunar spacecraft hypothesis.”

One of the first to take up this hypothesis was the researcher and author Don Wilson. He described his hypothesis of an artificial satellite orbiting the Earth in two books: “Our Mysterious Luna Spacecraft” (1975) and “Secrets of Our Luna Spacecraft” (1979).

Wilson cited anomalies such as shallow lunar craters (the strong hull protecting the lunar craft prevents meteorites from penetrating deeply) and the presence of strange structures and lights on the surface (evidence of artificial vehicles and navigational markers) as evidence that the Luna was not naturally formed.

Inspired by Vasin and Shcherbakov’s “Soviet spaceship theory”, Wilson agreed that the Moon was an ancient alien spacecraft. This required it to be basically a hollow vehicle, especially considering the size of the intended payload: “The huge spacecraft carried everything necessary to serve as a sort of Noah’s Ark for sentient beings on their journey through the universe.”

Interestingly, Wilson mentioned the existence of lunar features that are like skylights. He referred to the work of amateur astronomer Dr. HP Wilkins, who was convinced that “within the Moon there really are vast hollow regions, perhaps in the form of caves, and which are connected to the surface by huge holes or shafts.”

Wilson suggested that these “pits” may be the entrances to “hidden underground bases located within the Moon.”

Another book, written in the same vein as Wilson’s, was compiled by Christopher Knight and Alan Butler. In the book ”  Who built the Moon  (2005) the authors point out many “unreal coincidences” between the Moon, the Sun and the Earth (for example, the exact dimensions that the Moon needs for a solar eclipse or the regulation of the tides from Earth) and insist that the satellite of our planet was created the target.

In contrast to Wilson’s conclusion that the Moon was a “cosmic Noah’s Ark” that was brought to its present location from outside our solar system, Butler and Knight suggested that it was fabricated by terrestrial architects using the planet’s available elements.

It is alleged that this is why tests of materials on the lunar surface have shown that their composition is extremely similar to that of the earth.

As for who owns the plans for the artificial moon, in an interview with New Dawn, Knight explained three possibilities:

“God, aliens or humans. The only one that is 100% scientifically possible is the latter. Time travel is generally accepted as physically possible, and several scientists are close to sending matter back in time. We can surmise that in the future machines could be created that could be sent back to remove matter from the young Earth for the construction of the Moon, perhaps using mini-black hole technology.”

Some of the mysteries surrounding the formation of the Moon may eventually be answered by investing in rugged autonomous robots. New rovers are being developed specifically for subsurface exploration of the lunar dark crevices. Today’s prototypes can be propelled from the gaping alien maw and are equipped with high-resolution imaging equipment.

One of the advanced models has been tested in a crater in Utah in preparation for a future study of the moon. The unmanned lunar lander, called the PitRanger by its creators at Carnegie Mellon University, is designed to collect photos of the funnel from various angles and get a complete picture of the situation on Earth.

Gaining a more detailed understanding of these underground portals could greatly expand our understanding of how the Moon works. With any luck, some of these rovers could be deployed as early as 2022 and should be seriously considered as part of NASA’s Artemis lunar missions.

It may not be an ancient hollow alien spacecraft, but the origin of the moon is still unclear from a scientific point of view. It makes sense that a concerted effort is being made to send rovers to explore underground tunnels on the Moon, not only for their base-building value, but also for the trove of data they likely hold about how bodies formed on the Moon. . our solar system.

If soon-to-be-explored lunar tunnels extend far below the surface, they could help explain some oft-cited Moon anomalies and provide access to secrets buried beneath the regolith.

As evidenced by the growing interest in robots capable of penetrating sublunar cavities and lunar exploration, even if hollow moon theories don’t excite NASA officials, they do generate interest.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *